Cost–Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness

ECONORIA Decision Lab 07 — Cost–Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness

EECONORIATHINK · SIMULATE · UNDERSTAND · DECIDE

Decision Lab ↗

POLICY DECISION LAB · LABORATORY 07

Cost–Benefit &
Cost-Effectiveness.

Compare resources used with social consequences over time. Discount future streams, test optimism and distribution, and recognize when cost per outcome is more honest than assigning money values to everything that matters.

07 Economic appraisal110 MinutesNPV Present social value
BENEFITS
COSTS

TWO APPRAISAL QUESTIONS

Is it worthwhile?
Is it efficient?

Cost–benefit analysis monetizes social consequences to assess net value. Cost-effectiveness compares costs with a common outcome when monetization is inappropriate or unnecessary.

COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS

Do benefits exceed costs?

NPV = PV(B) − PV(C)

Useful when major consequences can be valued credibly and the decision concerns overall social return.

COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

What is the cost per outcome?

CER = PV(C) / Outcome

Useful when options pursue the same measurable outcome but monetizing that outcome would be contentious.

TIME AND SOCIAL VALUE

Future consequences
have present value.

PV

Discounting

PVₜ = Xₜ/(1+r)ᵗ

The social discount rate determines how future costs and benefits enter today’s appraisal.

BCR

Benefit–cost ratio

BCR = PV(B)/PV(C)

Values above one indicate discounted benefits exceed discounted costs.

Δ

Incremental analysis

ΔC/ΔE

Compare additional cost with additional effect relative to the next credible alternative.

DISCOUNTED APPRAISAL LAB

Change the assumptions.
Test social value.

Enter investment cost, annual benefits, outcome scale and horizon. ECONORIA calculates NPV, BCR and cost-effectiveness after optimism and equity adjustments.

SOCIAL APPRAISAL ACCOUNTPositive social value
PV BENEFITS€224m
PV COSTS€187m
NET PRESENT VALUE€37m
BENEFIT–COST RATIO1.20
DISCOUNTED ANNUAL NET BENEFIT

APPRAISAL VERDICTDiscounted social benefits exceed costs under the current assumptions. Report sensitivity before recommending commitment.

APPRAISAL DISCIPLINE

Monetization must not
erase moral limits.

01

Define the baseline

Count only costs and benefits additional to the credible counterfactual.

02

Avoid double counting

Do not add income, output and the same underlying welfare benefit repeatedly.

03

Report distribution

Positive aggregate NPV can coexist with serious losses for particular groups.

04

Keep rights as constraints

Not every legal, ethical or ecological threshold should be traded against money.

SCIENTIFIC CHECKPOINT

When is cost-effectiveness
especially useful?

Which situation best fits cost-effectiveness analysis?

Continue to Laboratory 8: Economic Impact Assessment →